Granted U.S. PatentUS 12,528,021 B2

Patent Position Mapping

07Patent Position Mapping

Dependent Method Claims 2–6 — Detailed Mapping

Additional Method-Claim Limitations Assessed Against Publicly Disclosed iRacing Functionality. Each dependent claim carries two separate findings: the additional limitation, and the dependent claim as a whole including every limitation inherited from Claim 1. No percentage scoring is used and no infringement conclusion is drawn.

Granted U.S. Patent —US 12,528,021 B2

View Issued Claims 2–6

Opening legal framework

Dependent Claims Incorporate Claim 1

View Issued Claims 2–6

Claims 2–6 each depend from independent Claim 1. Each therefore incorporates all limitations of Claim 1 and adds a further technical requirement.

Governing legal structure

CLAIM 1 + ADDITIONAL DEPENDENT-CLAIM LIMITATION = DEPENDENT CLAIM

A dependent claim cannot be treated as completely mapped unless both Claim 1 and the additional dependent limitation are established.

Claim 1 — Base Method Architecture

Claim 2

+ user performance data

Claim 3

+ 2D or 3D representation

Claim 4

+ modifiable environmental / physical conditions

Claim 5

+ user-modifiable virtual equipment

Claim 6

+ specified virtual racing landscape

The additional limitation may exhibit strong correspondence with publicly disclosed iRacing technology even where complete correspondence with the dependent claim as a whole remains unestablished, because one or more limitations inherited from Claim 1 remain unresolved. This distinction is fundamental.

Methodology

Dual Assessment Format — Two Separate Findings Per Claim

A. Additional limitation assessment

How strongly does the additional limitation correspond with the identified iRacing functionality?

B. Whole dependent claim assessment

Does the currently available public evidence establish the dependent claim as a whole, including all inherited limitations of Claim 1?

These assessments are never merged. For example: the additional Claim 3 limitation is publicly established, but Claim 3 as a whole is not established from current public disclosures because complete Claim 1 correspondence has not been established. This format is used consistently for Claims 2–6.

No percentage-overlap scoring is used anywhere in this section, and no infringement conclusion is drawn. Assessments are descriptive technical statements about the current public record only.

Dependent claim 02

Claim 2 — User Performance Data

View Issued Claim 2

Exact issued claim language

The method according to claim 1, further including receiving, by the one or more processors, data relating to performance of one or more users who virtually participate in the racing event.

Controlling text: the issued claim set of US 12,528,021 B2.

Technical requirement

  • One or more processors receive data.
  • The data relates to performance of one or more users.
  • Those users virtually participate in the racing event.

The additional limitation does not merely require user identity; it requires data concerning user performance. The claim broadly requires performance-related user data — not every possible performance metric listed below is required.

Potential categories, where supported by evidence

  • lap time
  • race results
  • telemetry
  • speed
  • braking
  • throttle
  • steering
  • safety performance
  • race incidents
  • driver rating
  • session performance
  • race history

Not every possible performance metric is treated as required; the claim broadly requires performance-related user data.

Public evidence

Identified First-Party Evidence — Claim 2 Additional Limitation

  1. iRacing states that Safety Rating is a driver safety/performance indicator determined using incident points, corner counts and session information, is maintained separately across racing disciplines, and is currently described on a scale running from 0.00 to 4.99.

    iRacing SupportiRacing How-To: Safety Rating (support documentation)Last modified 15 July 2026

  2. iRacing describes incident points as recorded per-session events arising from contact and off-track excursions, forming the input to the safety metric.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing 101: Incident Points20 June 2024 (historical disclosure; feature described as current)

  3. iRacing's 2025 Season 1 Vehicle Telemetry Update describes a dedicated anonymized race data telemetry collection system: race data telemetry is automatically generated while participating in selected official series, telemetry from opted-in participants is collected after the session, and the data is used to support future iRacing improvements and features.

    iRacing Release Documentation2025 Season 1 Vehicle Telemetry Update [2025.02.18.01]18 February 2025 (last modified 25 February 2025)

  4. iRacing publicly provides lap timing, race results, driver positions, session information, performance history and user telemetry output as part of ordinary participation and post-session review.

    iRacing Sporting CodeiRacing support documentation and Official Sporting Code (driver skill ratings, race procedures)Sporting Code V.2025.09.09; accessed for this review August 2026

  5. iRacing's February 2026 development update states that the newer in-sim UI includes live telemetry capability, including brake and throttle traces over time, to help users understand their own driving performance.

    iRacing Release DocumentationiRacing development update, February 2026February 2026

Claim 2 — technical flow

User Performance Data Handling

User participates in iRacing session

Driver input / performance

Lap times · Throttle · Brake · Steering · Incidents · Race result · Telemetry

iRacing system

Performance data received / recorded / processed

Strong public evidence of performance-data handling.

A. Additional limitation assessment

Additional Claim 2 Limitation

Publicly Established / Strong Correspondence

Publicly available iRacing materials establish that iRacing receives, stores and/or processes multiple categories of data concerning users' performance during virtual racing activity.

This corresponds strongly with the additional performance-data requirement of Claim 2.

Descriptive assessment only. No numerical or percentage scoring is applied.

Important distinction

User performance telemetry is not physical-event participant telemetry

iRacing's internal user telemetry strongly supports Claim 2's additional performance-data limitation. It does not establish Claim 1's external physical-event data feed. User performance telemetry and physical-event participant telemetry must be kept separate at all times.

B. Whole dependent claim assessment

Claim 2 as a Whole — Not Yet Established

Claim 2 as a whole — not yet established

Claim 2 incorporates all limitations of Claim 1.

Section 06 identified unresolved Claim 1 requirements, particularly the event data feed from a corresponding physical racing event, event-derived virtual participant representation, participant movement according to corresponding physical movement, and user competition against those event-derived participants.

Strong correspondence with Claim 2's additional performance-data limitation therefore does not establish Claim 2 as a whole.

Unresolved Claim 1 requirements carried forward (Section 06)

  • Event data feed from a corresponding physical racing event
  • Event-derived virtual participant representation
  • Participant movement according to corresponding physical movement
  • User competition against those event-derived participants

Dependent claim 03

Claim 3 — 2D / 3D Representation of the Physical Racing Environment

View Issued Claim 3

Exact issued claim language

The method according to claim 1, wherein the multi-dimensional virtual environment is either a three dimensional or two dimensional representation of the physical environment of the racing event.

Controlling text: the issued claim set of US 12,528,021 B2.

Technical requirement

  • The virtual environment takes a specified dimensional form: three-dimensional or two-dimensional.
  • That environment represents the physical environment of the racing event.

For iRacing, the principal relevant implementation is clearly three-dimensional.

Public evidence

Identified First-Party Evidence — Claim 3 Additional Limitation

  1. iRacing publicly describes a highly detailed three-dimensional simulation environment, with track-building technology using real-world scan data and modelling to recreate physical racing circuits.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing Track Technology (first-party)Evergreen product page; accessed for this review August 2026

  2. Section 06 established strong public evidence relating to physical track geometry, track surfaces, elevation, camber, bumps, surrounding structures and the racing environment.

    iRacing First PartySection 06 — Claim 1 mapping (internal cross-reference)This review, August 2026

  3. The 2026 Season 3 release identifies a full rebuild of WeatherTech Raceway Laguna Seca using new scan data and artwork, while other tracks received fully modelled 3D curbs and updated surfaces.

    iRacing Release DocumentationiRacing 2026 Season 3 release documentation2026 Season 3

  4. The 2026 Season 1 release similarly describes new scans and complete environment rebuilding for multiple circuits.

    iRacing Release DocumentationiRacing 2026 Season 1 release documentation2026 Season 1

  5. iRacing publicly lists a large catalogue of recreated real-world circuits in numerous configurations.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing Tracks (first-party)Evergreen product page; accessed for this review August 2026

A. Additional limitation assessment

Additional Claim 3 Limitation

Publicly Established / Very Strong Correspondence

There is strong first-party public evidence that iRacing provides three-dimensional representations of physical racing environments.

Current release documentation shows continued rebuilding of those environments from updated physical scan data.

The additional Claim 3 limitation is one of the strongest individual areas of correspondence identified in the present analysis.

Descriptive assessment only. No numerical or percentage scoring is applied.

B. Whole dependent claim assessment

Claim 3 as a Whole — Not Yet Established

Claim 3 as a whole — not yet established

The dependent claim includes Claim 1.

The unresolved event-feed and event-participant requirements identified in Section 06 remain unaddressed on the present public record.

Unresolved Claim 1 requirements carried forward (Section 06)

  • Event data feed from a corresponding physical racing event
  • Event-derived virtual participant representation
  • Participant movement according to corresponding physical movement
  • User competition against those event-derived participants

Dependent claim 04

Claim 4 — Modifiable Event Conditions

View Issued Claim 4

Exact issued claim language

The method according to claim 1, wherein the multi-dimensional virtual environment that substantially simulates the physical environment of the racing event is modifiable to simulate any defined environmental and/or physical conditions.

Controlling text: the issued claim set of US 12,528,021 B2.

Technical requirement

  • The virtual environment is modifiable.
  • The modification simulates defined environmental conditions and/or physical conditions.

The terms 'environmental' and 'physical conditions' should not be narrowly construed without counsel review. The specification may provide examples, but the issued language controls.

Public evidence

Identified First-Party Evidence — Claim 4 Additional Limitation

  1. iRacing documents three weather generation modes — Static Weather (parameters including cloud cover, track moisture and temperature), Forecasted Weather (users may define conditions or allow iRacing to generate realistic weather using historical weather data sourced from the selected track) and Timeline Weather (conditions configured across a session timeline). Rainfall and wet conditions are modelled for supported cars and tracks.

    iRacing SupportiRacing Weather System & Rain (support documentation)Last modified 9 September 2025

  2. Current iRacing release documentation describes dynamic track behaviour including track surface temperature, solar-energy effects, moisture, water drainage, dust, effects from vehicle tyres and changing racing-surface properties.

    iRacing Release DocumentationiRacing 2026 Season 3 release documentation (dynamic track model)2026 Season 3

  3. iRacing's AI race setup documentation states that users may configure weather, track conditions, track options, time of day, cars and event structure.

    iRacing SupportHow To Use iRacing AI (support documentation)Accessed for this review August 2026

A. Additional limitation assessment

Additional Claim 4 Limitation

Publicly Established / Very Strong Correspondence

iRacing publicly discloses sophisticated configurable and dynamically evolving environmental and physical conditions within its virtual racing environments.

Evidence includes weather, rain, temperature, track moisture, historical weather modelling, dynamic track state, water drainage, surface temperature and track evolution.

The virtual environment is therefore not merely a fixed geometric model: physical racing conditions can evolve computationally during a session.

Descriptive assessment only. No numerical or percentage scoring is applied.

Important distinction

Environmental modification does not establish the Claim 1 event data feed

The fact that iRacing can modify environmental conditions does not establish that the underlying environment has been generated from the event data feed required by Claim 1. Separately, historical weather data used to create realistic iRacing weather must not be confused with historical racing-event data under Claim 1: iRacing's weather documentation states that automatic forecast mode may use historical weather data from the selected track, which is highly relevant to Claim 4's environmental modelling but does not by itself establish Claim 1's racing-event data feed.

B. Whole dependent claim assessment

Claim 4 as a Whole — Not Yet Established

Claim 4 as a whole — not yet established

The additional limitation is strongly established on the public record.

The incorporated Claim 1 requirements remain incomplete on present public evidence.

Unresolved Claim 1 requirements carried forward (Section 06)

  • Event data feed from a corresponding physical racing event
  • Event-derived virtual participant representation
  • Participant movement according to corresponding physical movement
  • User competition against those event-derived participants

Dependent claim 05

Claim 5 — Virtual Equipment Modified by User Input

View Issued Claim 5

Exact issued claim language

The method according to claim 1, wherein the multi-dimensional virtual environment further includes virtual equipment that is/are modifiable in part, or whole, according to user input entered prior to and/or during the racing event.

Controlling text: the issued claim set of US 12,528,021 B2.

Technical requirement

  • The virtual environment includes virtual equipment.
  • That equipment is modifiable in part or in whole.
  • The modification occurs according to user input.
  • The user input may be entered prior to and/or during the racing event.

This is broader than merely selecting a car: the analysis identifies actual virtual vehicle/equipment parameters that users may modify.

Public evidence

Identified First-Party Evidence — Claim 5 Additional Limitation

  1. iRacing support documentation explains that users may modify extensive vehicle setup parameters, including ride height, spring rate, damper settings, aerodynamic settings, tyre pressure, brake settings and suspension-related settings; the iRacing garage permits setup changes, and setups may be loaded, imported, shared and modified.

    iRacing SupportiRacing Setup: A Beginner's Guide on How to Get Started (support documentation)Last modified 24 October 2025

  2. The first-party iRacing Setup Guide enumerates user-adjustable chassis and aerodynamic parameters including tyres, camber, caster, toe, roll bars, brake bias, spring perch offset, corner weights, wings, springs, dampers and gearing.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing Setup Guide (first-party PDF)First-party publication; accessed for this review August 2026

  3. A 2024 rain-system hotfix expressly confirms that rain-ready cars can change tyre compounds in fixed-setup events, and iRacing release documentation identifies brake-bias adjustment during fixed-setup sessions, pit-stop-adjustable aerodynamic parameters on certain cars, refuelling and tyre changes.

    iRacing Release DocumentationiRacing rain-system hotfix release documentation2024 hotfix (historical disclosure; feature described as current)

  4. A 2026 release states that certain vehicles support rain tyres that can be equipped and changed during pit stops.

    iRacing Release DocumentationiRacing 2026 release documentation2026

Claim 5 — virtual equipment flow

User-Directed Equipment Modification

User

Garage / vehicle setup

Virtual equipment

Tyres · Suspension · Ride height · Aerodynamics · Brake settings · Fuel / strategy · Other permitted parameters

Race session

Permitted in-race modification

Tyre changes · Brake bias · Pit adjustments · Other supported settings

A. Additional limitation assessment

Additional Claim 5 Limitation

Publicly Established / Very Strong Correspondence

iRacing publicly establishes user-driven modification of virtual vehicle/equipment parameters both before racing activity and, for supported parameters, during racing activity.

This is one of the stronger dependent-claim additional limitations, and is directly responsive to the 'prior to and/or during' wording of the issued claim.

Descriptive assessment only. No numerical or percentage scoring is applied.

Important distinction

Developer model updates are not user modification

The claim requires virtual equipment modifiable according to user input. iRacing developers updating tyre physics or a vehicle model is not equivalent to a user modifying virtual equipment. The primary evidence is therefore garage setup, user tyre changes, brake bias, pit-stop changes and similar user-directed functionality.

B. Whole dependent claim assessment

Claim 5 as a Whole — Not Yet Established

Claim 5 as a whole — not yet established

Claim 5 incorporates every limitation of Claim 1.

The unresolved event-data-feed and event-derived participant-movement requirements identified in Section 06 remain, so the dependent claim as a whole is not established.

Unresolved Claim 1 requirements carried forward (Section 06)

  • Event data feed from a corresponding physical racing event
  • Event-derived virtual participant representation
  • Participant movement according to corresponding physical movement
  • User competition against those event-derived participants

Dependent claim 06

Claim 6 — Specified Virtual Racing Landscape

View Issued Claim 6

Exact issued claim language

The method according to claim 1, wherein the multi-dimensional virtual environment includes a virtual racing landscape selected from any one or more of a race track, an animal race track, an automobile race track, a dirt road, a sports court/arena, a marathon track, a rally (race car) track, a ski/snow field or a body of water.

Controlling text: the issued claim set of US 12,528,021 B2.

Technical requirement

  • The virtual environment includes a virtual racing landscape.
  • That landscape is selected from one or more of the enumerated categories.

The claim uses a selection from one or more listed categories. For the iRacing mapping the relevant categories include at least automobile race track, race track, dirt road and rally (race car) track. iRacing is not mapped against categories it does not support — animal racing, marathon events, skiing and bodies of water are not asserted, absent identified evidence.

Public evidence

Identified First-Party Evidence — Claim 6 Additional Limitation

  1. iRacing publicly lists primary racing disciplines including NASCAR oval racing, Formula racing, sports-car road racing, Rallycross, Dirt Oval, Off-Road and Hillclimb.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing Racing Disciplines (first-party)Evergreen product page; accessed for this review August 2026

  2. iRacing contains more than 100 tracks in numerous configurations and publicly describes precision recreation of real-world circuits — corresponding with the automobile race track / race track categories.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing Tracks (first-party)Evergreen product page; accessed for this review August 2026

  3. The current Official Sporting Code identifies Dirt Road as a racing discipline involving cars/trucks operating on non-circular tracks composed at least partly of dirt racing surfaces, and current 2026 releases continue to add Dirt Road configurations.

    iRacing Sporting CodeiRacing Official Sporting Code V.2025.09.09; 2026 release documentation9 September 2025; 2026 releases

  4. iRacing maintains a dedicated Rallycross discipline involving combinations of dirt and pavement, jumps, real-world rallycross venues and purpose-designed layouts.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing Rallycross (first-party)Evergreen product page; accessed for this review August 2026

  5. iRacing supports extensive dirt oval racing, including real-world tracks and multiple dirt racing vehicles. 'Dirt oval' is not separately enumerated verbatim in Claim 6 and is treated here as relevant to the broader 'race track' category rather than forced into 'dirt road'.

    iRacing First PartyiRacing Dirt Racing (first-party)Evergreen product page; accessed for this review August 2026

A. Additional limitation assessment

Additional Claim 6 Limitation

Publicly Established / Very Strong Correspondence

iRacing clearly operates virtual racing landscapes falling within multiple categories expressly identified in Claim 6, including automobile race tracks, race tracks, dirt-road environments and rally/race-car environments.

The existence of unsupported alternatives within the claim list does not require all alternatives to be present, because the claim permits selection of one or more categories.

Descriptive assessment only. No numerical or percentage scoring is applied.

B. Whole dependent claim assessment

Claim 6 as a Whole — Not Yet Established

Claim 6 as a whole — not yet established

Claim 6 incorporates Claim 1.

The unresolved Claim 1 event-feed and participant-movement architecture remains, so the dependent claim as a whole is not established.

Unresolved Claim 1 requirements carried forward (Section 06)

  • Event data feed from a corresponding physical racing event
  • Event-derived virtual participant representation
  • Participant movement according to corresponding physical movement
  • User competition against those event-derived participants

Claim 6 — category-by-category

iRacing Supports Multiple Relevant Racing Landscapes

iRacing publicly lists primary disciplines including NASCAR oval racing, Formula racing, sports-car road racing, Rallycross, Dirt Oval, Off-Road and Hillclimb — directly establishing use of multiple forms of virtual racing environment.

Only the landscapes actually supported by iRacing are mapped. No correspondence is asserted with animal racing, marathon events, skiing or bodies of water.

Automobile race tracks

Publicly established

iRacing contains more than 100 tracks in numerous configurations and publicly describes precision recreation of real-world circuits. This strongly corresponds with the automobile race track / race track categories.

iRacing TracksAccessed August 2026

Dirt road

Publicly established

The current Official Sporting Code identifies Dirt Road as a racing discipline involving cars/trucks operating on non-circular tracks composed at least partly of dirt racing surfaces. Current 2026 releases continue to add Dirt Road configurations.

Official Sporting Code V.2025.09.099 September 2025

Rallycross / rally-type environments

Publicly established / strong correspondence

iRacing maintains a dedicated Rallycross discipline involving combinations of dirt, pavement, jumps, real-world rallycross venues and purpose-designed layouts. This is highly relevant to the claim's reference to a rally (race car) racing landscape.

iRacing RallycrossAccessed August 2026

Dirt racing (dirt oval)

Relevant to the broader race-track category

iRacing supports extensive dirt oval racing, including real-world tracks and multiple dirt racing vehicles. “Dirt oval” is not separately enumerated verbatim in Claim 6; it is treated as relevant to the broader “race track” category and is not forced into “dirt road” where that would be technically inaccurate.

iRacing Dirt RacingAccessed August 2026

Master dependent-claim table

Claims 2–6 — Dual Assessment Summary

ClaimAdditional requirementiRacing public evidenceAdditional limitationClaim as a whole
Claim 2User performance data.Safety Rating, telemetry, lap information, race data collection, live input traces.Established / StrongNot yet established
Claim 32D or 3D representation of physical racing environment.3D laser-scanned circuits, updated physical scan data, three-dimensional racing environments.Established / Very StrongNot yet established
Claim 4Modifiable environmental / physical conditions.Weather, rain, track moisture, temperature, historical weather, Dynamic Track Model.Established / Very StrongNot yet established
Claim 5User-modifiable virtual equipment before and/or during event.Garage setup, tyres, suspension, aero, tyre pressure, brake bias, pit adjustments, tyre changes.Established / Very StrongNot yet established
Claim 6Specified virtual racing landscape.Automobile circuits, dirt roads, Rallycross, dirt racing, road racing.Established / Very StrongNot yet established

Descriptive assessments only. A dependent claim is not described as fully established merely because its additional limitation is publicly established.

Important commercial finding

The Dependent Features Are Not the Principal Public-Evidence Problem

The present review identifies substantial public correspondence between iRacing and each of the additional limitations introduced by Claims 2–6.

The central unresolved issue remains the base architecture inherited from Claim 1, particularly:

Physical race event

Event data feed

Event-derived virtual participants

Movement corresponding to physical participant movement

User competition against those participants

This is an important analytical conclusion: the separation lies upstream of the dependent simulation features, not within them.

Why this matters strategically

iRacing Already Possesses Many of the Downstream Components

Claim 2

User performance data

→ iRacing: strong existing capability

Claim 3

3D racing environment

→ iRacing: strong existing capability

Claim 4

Dynamic environmental conditions

→ iRacing: strong existing capability

Claim 5

User-modifiable virtual equipment

→ iRacing: strong existing capability

Claim 6

Relevant racing landscapes

→ iRacing: strong existing capability

Remaining strategic bridge

Real physical event data

Real participant movement

Event-driven virtual participants

This demonstrates why the granted patent could have strategic relevance even though complete Claim 1 mapping has not yet been established on the public record.

Methodological warnings

Analytical Rules Governing Claims 2–6

Do not misstate Claim 4

Historical weather data used to create realistic iRacing weather must not be confused with historical racing-event data under Claim 1. iRacing's weather documentation states that automatic forecast mode may use historical weather data from the selected track. That is highly relevant to Claim 4's environmental modelling. It does not by itself establish Claim 1's historical racing-event feed. This distinction is critical.

Do not misstate Claim 2 telemetry

iRacing's internal user telemetry strongly supports Claim 2's additional performance-data limitation. It does not establish Claim 1's external physical-event data feed. User performance telemetry must be separated from physical-event participant telemetry at all times.

Do not misstate Claim 5 equipment

The claim requires virtual equipment modifiable according to user input. iRacing developers updating tyre physics is not equivalent to a user modifying virtual equipment. Garage setup, user tyre changes, brake bias, pit-stop changes and similar user-directed functionality are the primary evidence.

Do not misstate Claim 6

Map only the racing landscapes actually supported by iRacing. Do not imply support for animal racing, marathon events, skiing or bodies of water unless evidence is identified. The existence of those alternatives in Claim 6 does not require all alternatives to be present: the claim permits selection from one or more listed categories.

Section 07 evidence repository

Identified Sources — Claims 2–6

Dates shown for every source
TopicSourceProvenanceDate
Issued Patent Claims 2–6US 12,528,021 B2 — issued claim setIssued U.S. PatentGranted patent record; accessed August 2026
User performance dataiRacing How-To: Safety RatingiRacing SupportLast modified 15 July 2026
Incident points (historical disclosure)iRacing 101: Incident PointsiRacing First Party20 June 2024
Vehicle telemetry collection2025 Season 1 Vehicle Telemetry Update [2025.02.18.01]iRacing Release Documentation18 February 2025
Live user telemetryiRacing development update — in-sim UI live telemetryiRacing Release DocumentationFebruary 2026
Weather / environmental conditionsiRacing Weather System & RainiRacing SupportLast modified 9 September 2025
Dynamic track modeliRacing 2026 Season 3 release documentationiRacing Release Documentation2026 Season 3
User-configurable AI session conditionsHow To Use iRacing AIiRacing SupportAccessed August 2026
Vehicle setupiRacing Setup: A Beginner's Guide / iRacing Setup GuideiRacing SupportLast modified 24 October 2025
During-race equipment changesiRacing release documentation (rain hotfix; 2026 releases)iRacing Release Documentation2024 hotfix; 2026 releases
Racing landscapesiRacing Racing DisciplinesiRacing First PartyAccessed August 2026
RallycrossiRacing Rallycross (official page)iRacing First PartyAccessed August 2026
Dirt / Dirt RoadiRacing Dirt Racing; Official Sporting Code V.2025.09.09iRacing Sporting Code9 September 2025; accessed August 2026

Evidence date discipline. Historical disclosures are not presented as necessarily current without confirming continued support. Current 2025–2026 first-party sources are preferred; where a feature was disclosed historically and appears to remain present, both the original disclosure and the current evidence are identified.

Section 07 visual summary

Additional Dependent-Claim Limitations

Claim 2

Performance data

Strong

Claim 3

3D environment

Very strong

Claim 4

Environmental modification

Very strong

Claim 5

Virtual equipment modification

Very strong

Claim 6

Racing landscape

Very strong

But each claim still incorporates Claim 1

Complete dependent-claim correspondence therefore remains unresolved, because the base physical-event-data architecture has not yet been established.

These are descriptive technical assessments only, and are not a numerical rating system.

Legal review note

Dependent Claim Analysis — Legal Qualification

The additional dependent limitations appear, based upon the identified public evidence, to correspond substantially with multiple established iRacing functions. This does not constitute a conclusion that Claims 2–6 are infringed or fully practised. Each dependent claim incorporates Claim 1 and must be assessed as a complete combination under applicable U.S. patent law.

Commercial / strategic — clearly labelled

Strategic Observation

The public record indicates that iRacing already possesses sophisticated implementations of many of the additional capabilities expressly contemplated by the dependent method claims. These include:

  • performance data capture;
  • 3D physical environment reconstruction;
  • dynamic environmental simulation;
  • configurable physical conditions;
  • user-modifiable virtual racing equipment;
  • multiple claimed categories of racing landscape.

Accordingly, the principal technological separation between current publicly disclosed iRacing functionality and the broader granted method-claim architecture appears to lie not in these downstream simulation features, but in the specific real-world-event-data-to-virtual-participant relationship identified in Claim 1.

Section closing

Claims 2–6 — Current Public-Evidence Position

The additional limitations of Claims 2–6 demonstrate substantial correspondence with publicly disclosed iRacing functionality.

However, because each claim depends from Claim 1, complete correspondence with Claims 2–6 as a whole cannot presently be established until the unresolved limitations of Claim 1 are addressed.

Claim 1 base architecture

+ Strongly corresponding dependent features

Strategic patent relevance

But

Not yet complete whole-claim mapping.

Next

Independent Claim 7 — System Claim

Full limitation-by-limitation system mapping

The next section will separately assess the issued system claim, including the claimed hardware, processor, communication, display, data-feed and user-participation architecture.

The Claim 1 result is not reused: Claim 7 must be independently mapped.