Granted U.S. PatentUS 12,528,021 B2

Patent Position Mapping

12Patent Position Mapping

Consolidated Technical Correspondence & Evidentiary Gaps

Whole-Patent Analysis Across Issued Claims 1–18 and Publicly Disclosed iRacing Technology. This section consolidates the findings of Sections 06–11 rather than repeating the individual claim charts, and answers five questions: what the issued claims are directed to as a complete technical architecture; which elements are publicly established within iRacing; which show only partial correspondence; which limitations are not established from the current public record; and what additional evidence would materially change the analysis.

Granted U.S. Patent —US 12,528,021 B2

View Issued Claims 1–18

Opening — the granted patent position

The analysis concerns the claimed combination

U.S. Patent No. 12,528,021 B2 contains 18 issued claims organised across three principal claim families.

Claims 1–6

Method

Claims 7–12

System

Claims 13–18

Computer-readable medium / stored instructions

Sections 06–11

The detailed analysis identifies substantial correspondence between publicly disclosed iRacing technology and numerous individual limitations and dependent-claim features.

However

Patent claim analysis ultimately concerns the complete combination of limitations recited by the relevant claim — not merely whether individual technological features exist somewhere within the target company's ecosystem.

SourceUS 12,528,021 B2 — issued claims 1–18

The patent's core technical architecture

Consolidated architecture derived from the issued claim families

View Issued Claims

Real-world racing event

Event data

Live · pre-recorded · historical

Processor / computing architecture

Multi-dimensional virtual environment

Physical racing environment represented

Physical event participants virtualized

Virtual movement corresponds to physical participant movement

User avatar

User hardware / display / controls

User navigates the race path

User virtually participates and competes against event-derived participants

Additional claimed capabilities

  • Performance data
  • 3D / 2D physical environment
  • Modifiable environmental conditions
  • Modifiable physical conditions
  • User-modifiable virtual equipment
  • Specified racing surfaces

Recited by the dependent claims across all three families.

Final visual

Granted U.S. Patent — the core architecture

Granted U.S. Patent — core architecture

Physical racing event

Event data

Physical participants

Corresponding virtual participants

Interactive virtual environment

Remote user participation

Unresolved bridge

Physical event data → event-derived virtual participants

iRacing — publicly established capability

Real-world racing assets

High-fidelity virtual environment

Virtual competitors

Networked / Ghost Racing

Remote user participation

This is the principal technical and evidentiary question identified by the current public-information review.

Next — 13

Strategic Patent Relevance to iRacing

Why the granted U.S. patent may matter to iRacing's current and future racing technology.

  • Why iRacing is an appropriate commercial review target
  • How the granted patent complements its existing technology
  • Ghost Racing as a particularly relevant existing capability
  • NASCAR and INDYCAR relationships
  • Real-world-to-virtual motorsport convergence
  • Potential product evolution
  • Licensing / acquisition rationale
  • Why ownership or control of the patent could have strategic value
  • Portfolio, defensive and commercial IP considerations
  • Without making an infringement accusation

Sections 06–11 remain available for the underlying limitation-by-limitation charts: Claim 1 · Claim 7 · Claim 13